Skip to content

angr-management: init at 9.2.154 #477533

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
SuperSandro2000 merged 3 commits into from
Jan 11, 2026
Merged

angr-management: init at 9.2.154 #477533

SuperSandro2000 merged 3 commits into from
Jan 11, 2026

Conversation

@ConnorNelson
Copy link
Contributor

@ConnorNelson ConnorNelson commented Jan 6, 2026 •
edited
Loading

https://github.com/angr/angr-management

Things done

  • Built on platform:
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Ran nixpkgs-review on this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage.
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files, usually in ./result/bin/.
  • Nixpkgs Release Notes
    • Package update: when the change is major or breaking.
  • NixOS Release Notes
    • Module addition: when adding a new NixOS module.
    • Module update: when the change is significant.
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md, pkgs/README.md, maintainers/README.md and other READMEs.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

github-actions[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view

@ConnorNelson ConnorNelson changed the base branch from nixos-unstable to master January 6, 2026 20:08
@ConnorNelson ConnorNelson force-pushed the angr-management-pr360310 branch from 161bef4 to d87aa51 Compare January 6, 2026 20:08
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot closed this Jan 6, 2026
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot reopened this Jan 6, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot dismissed their stale review January 6, 2026 20:09

All good now, thank you!

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1 This PR causes 1 package to rebuild on Linux. 9.needs: reviewer This PR currently has no reviewers requested and needs attention. 8.has: maintainer-list (update) This PR changes `maintainers/maintainer-list.nix` labels Jan 6, 2026
@fabaff
Copy link
Member

fabaff commented Jan 6, 2026

Previous PR #360310

qzylinra
qzylinra reviewed Jan 7, 2026
View reviewed changes
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot removed the 9.needs: reviewer This PR currently has no reviewers requested and needs attention. label Jan 7, 2026
@ConnorNelson ConnorNelson force-pushed the angr-management-pr360310 branch from a424a3a to 16b6ea3 Compare January 7, 2026 16:47
@ConnorNelson
Copy link
Contributor Author

ConnorNelson commented Jan 9, 2026

Hey @qzylinra @fabaff @SuperSandro2000, what can I do to help get this merged?

@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 mentioned this pull request Jan 10, 2026
Closed
13 tasks
@ConnorNelson ConnorNelson requested a review from qzylinra January 11, 2026 05:29
@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 11, 2026
Merged via the queue into NixOS:master with commit 8842ded Jan 11, 2026
28 of 30 checks passed
@ConnorNelson ConnorNelson deleted the angr-management-pr360310 branch January 11, 2026 15:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@github-actions github-actions[bot] github-actions[bot] left review comments

@qzylinra qzylinra Awaiting requested review from qzylinra

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

8.has: maintainer-list (update) This PR changes `maintainers/maintainer-list.nix` 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 10.rebuild-linux: 1 This PR causes 1 package to rebuild on Linux.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@ConnorNelson @fabaff @qzylinra @SuperSandro2000 @spencerpogo