fix(airbyte-cdk): Fix Record Filter Validation in ConcurrentDeclarativeSource #45
Conversation
tolik0
force-pushed
the
tolik0/fix-concurrent-declarative-source-record-filter
branch
from
5404c2e to
08a9bb0
Compare
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes involve the addition of the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator
participant ConcurrentDeclarativeSource
ConcurrentDeclarativeSource->>ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator: Check for thread safety
ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator-->>ConcurrentDeclarativeSource: No warnings
ConcurrentDeclarativeSource->>ConcurrentDeclarativeSource: Proceed with processing
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/concurrent_declarative_source.py (1)
295-297: LGTM! Clean implementation of the filter exclusionThe implementation correctly excludes ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator from stream_state validation while maintaining thread safety checks for other filter types.
What do you think about adding a brief comment explaining why this decorator is excluded? Something like:
if ( record_selector.record_filter + # ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator is excluded as it doesn't use condition in a way that would cause thread safety issues and not isinstance(record_selector.record_filter, ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator) and "stream_state" in record_selector.record_filter.condition ):
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/concurrent_declarative_source.py(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/concurrent_declarative_source.py (2)
19-19: LGTM! Clean import addition
The import is well-placed with related imports and is necessary for the type check.
295-297: Verify ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator usage
Let's verify how this decorator is used across the codebase to ensure this exclusion is safe.
✅ Verification successful
The exclusion of ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator is correct and safe
Looking at the implementation and usage, this exclusion makes perfect sense! The ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator doesn't actually use the condition property for state-based filtering - it uses its own datetime-based logic with cursor fields instead. The warning about thread-safety is specifically for record filters that directly interpolate stream_state in their conditions, which this decorator doesn't do.
- The decorator's
filter_recordsmethod uses cursor-based datetime comparison instead of condition-based filtering - It's already designed to work with concurrent processing, using proper cursor initialization
- The exclusion helps prevent false positives in the thread-safety check
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage patterns of ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator
# Find all files that import or use ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator
echo "Files importing or using ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator:"
rg -l "ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator"
# Look for any condition-related method calls or attributes
echo "\nUsage patterns of condition with ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator:"
rg -A 5 "class ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator"
Length of output: 1514
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation details of ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator
# and its condition property
# First, let's see the full implementation
echo "Implementation of ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator:"
rg -A 20 "class ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator" airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/extractors/record_filter.py
# Check how condition is used in the implementation
echo "\nUsage of condition property:"
ast-grep --pattern 'class ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator {
$$$
def condition($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Let's also check test cases to understand expected behavior
echo "\nTest cases:"
rg -A 10 "ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator" unit_tests/sources/declarative/extractors/test_record_filter.py
Length of output: 2683
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how the condition property is used in the filter_records method
echo "Checking filter_records implementation:"
rg -A 15 "def filter_records" airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/extractors/record_filter.py
# Also check if there are any other methods that use the condition property
echo "\nOther uses of condition property:"
rg "condition" airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/extractors/record_filter.py
# Let's see how it's used in the concurrent source
echo "\nUsage in concurrent source:"
rg -A 5 -B 5 "ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator" airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/concurrent_declarative_source.py
Length of output: 4605
|
/autofix
|
tolik0
deleted the
tolik0/fix-concurrent-declarative-source-record-filter
branch
What
This PR updates the
ConcurrentDeclarativeSourceby modifying the record filter condition to exclude instances ofClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator. This exclusion is necessary becauseClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecoratordoes not have a condition.Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
ClientSideIncrementalRecordFilterDecorator.Documentation
Style