Implemented the handleTestNotification function. #1904
Conversation
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 Core Changes
- Primary purpose and scope: The PR implements the
handleTestNotificationfunction in theNotificationIntegrationModalcomponent. This function allows users to test their configured notification integrations (Slack, Discord, Telegram, Webhook) directly from the modal. - Key components modified: The
handleTestNotificationfunction within theNotificationIntegrationModal.jsxfile. - Cross-component impacts: None.
- Business value alignment: This feature enhances user experience by providing immediate feedback on whether the notification integrations are set up correctly, reducing friction in the setup process and ensuring users can confidently rely on their configured alerts.
2. Critical Findings
2.1 Must Fix (P0🔴)
Issue: Incorrect payload.platform for 'webhook' type.
- Impact: This bug directly impacts the correctness of the functionality for webhook notifications, leading to incorrect API request structures and potentially failed test notifications.
- Resolution: Correct the
payload.platformto 'webhook'.
2.2 Should Fix (P1🟡)
Issue: Code duplication in input validation.
- Impact: The repeated validation logic for webhook URLs violates the DRY principle, making the code harder to maintain and read.
- Suggested Solution: Extract webhook URL validation into a reusable helper function.
Issue: Generic error message in catch block.
- Impact: The current error message is somewhat generic, making it harder to debug issues.
- Suggested Solution: Enhance error handling by logging the full error object and providing a more informative error message.
2.3 Consider (P2🟢)
Area: Code maintainability and robustness.
- Improvement Opportunity: Consider using constants for notification type strings to improve code readability and maintainability.
Area: Testing coverage.
- Improvement Opportunity: Add unit tests for the
handleTestNotificationfunction to ensure its correctness and prevent regressions.
Area: Documentation.
- Improvement Opportunity: Document the
handleTestNotificationfunction to improve documentation completeness.
2.4 Summary of Action Items
- P0: Fix the incorrect
payload.platformfor 'webhook' type. - P1: Refactor webhook URL validation into a reusable helper function and enhance error handling in the
fetchcall. - P2: Consider using constants for notification type strings, add unit tests, and document the
handleTestNotificationfunction.
3. Technical Analysis
3.1 Code Logic Analysis
📁 src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx - handleTestNotification
- Submitted PR Code:
case 'webhook':
payload.webhookUrl = integrations[getFieldKey('webhook', 'url')];
payload.platform = 'slack'; // Use slack as platform for webhooks
if (!payload.webhookUrl) {
toast.error('Please enter a webhook URL first.');
return;
}
break;- Analysis:
- The
payload.platformis incorrectly set to 'slack' for 'webhook' type, which is a critical bug. - The validation logic for webhook URLs is repeated for different notification types, violating the DRY principle.
- The error handling in the
fetchcall is basic and could be improved for better debugging and user feedback.
- The
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
case 'webhook':
payload.webhookUrl = integrations[getFieldKey('webhook', 'url')];
payload.platform = 'webhook'; // Correct platform type to 'webhook'
if (!payload.webhookUrl) {
toast.error('Please enter a webhook URL first.');
return;
}
break;- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Fixes a critical bug, ensures correct API request structure for webhook tests.
- Business value: Ensures the "Test Webhook" functionality works as intended, providing accurate feedback to users configuring webhook integrations.
- Risk assessment: Fixing this bug is crucial for the correct functioning of the webhook notification tests.
📁 src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx - handleTestNotification
- Submitted PR Code:
if (!payload.webhookUrl) {
toast.error('Please enter a Slack webhook URL first.');
return;
}- Analysis:
- The validation logic for webhook URLs is repeated for different notification types, violating the DRY principle.
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
// Helper function to validate webhook URL
const validateWebhookUrl = (webhookUrl, platformName) => {
if (!webhookUrl) {
toast.error(`Please enter a ${platformName} webhook URL first.`); // More dynamic error message
return false;
}
return true;
};
case 'slack':
payload.webhookUrl = integrations[getFieldKey('slack', 'webhook')];
if (!validateWebhookUrl(payload.webhookUrl, 'Slack')) { // Use helper function
return;
}
break;
case 'discord':
payload.webhookUrl = integrations[getFieldKey('discord', 'webhook')];
if (!validateWebhookUrl(payload.webhookUrl, 'Discord')) { // Use helper function
return;
}
break;
case 'webhook':
payload.webhookUrl = integrations[getFieldKey('webhook', 'url')];
payload.platform = 'webhook'; // Correct platform type
if (!validateWebhookUrl(payload.webhookUrl, 'generic')) { // Use helper function
return;
}
break;- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Improves code maintainability, reduces redundancy, enhances code readability.
- Business value: Slightly improves code quality and reduces potential for bugs in the future due to code duplication.
- Risk assessment: Refactoring to eliminate duplication is a best practice and reduces the risk of future bugs.
📁 src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx - handleTestNotification
- Submitted PR Code:
} catch (error) {
toast.error(`Failed to send test notification: ${error.message}`);
}- Analysis:
- The error handling in the
fetchcall is basic and could be improved for better debugging and user feedback.
- The error handling in the
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
} catch (error) {
console.error("Error sending test notification:", error); // Log full error object for debugging
const errorMessage = error.message || 'Failed to send test notification.';
const userFriendlyMessage = data?.msg ? `Failed to send test notification: ${data.msg}` : errorMessage; // Use API error message if available
toast.error(userFriendlyMessage);
}- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Enhances error reporting, improves debugging, provides better user feedback.
- Business value: Improves user experience by providing more helpful error messages when test notifications fail, leading to faster troubleshooting and resolution.
- Risk assessment: Better error handling is crucial for diagnosing and resolving issues with test notifications.
3.2 Key Quality Aspects
- System scalability considerations: The function uses environment variables for API URLs, which is a good practice for scalability.
- Performance bottlenecks and optimizations: The function is asynchronous and uses
fetch, which is generally efficient for network requests. However, additional optimizations could be considered based on performance testing. - Testing strategy and coverage: The PR mentions self-testing, but it's unclear if unit or integration tests are included. Adding automated tests for the
handleTestNotificationfunction would significantly improve code robustness and prevent regressions. - Documentation needs: While the PR description is clear, ensuring that the
handleTestNotificationfunction and its usage are documented within the component or related documentation would be beneficial for future maintainers and developers.
4. Overall Evaluation
- Technical assessment: The PR implements a valuable feature with good coding practices. However, it contains a critical bug and some areas for improvement in terms of code quality and robustness.
- Business impact: The feature enhances user experience by providing immediate feedback on notification integrations, reducing friction in the setup process.
- Risk evaluation: The critical bug must be fixed before merging. The other issues should be addressed to improve code maintainability and robustness.
- Notable positive aspects and good practices: The use of environment variables for API URLs and
react-toastifyfor user feedback are positive aspects. - Implementation quality: The implementation is generally good, but there are areas for improvement in terms of code quality and robustness.
- Final recommendation: Reject the PR in its current state due to the P0 bug. Request the author to address the P0 and P1 issues before merging. The P2 improvements are recommended but can be addressed in subsequent PRs if necessary.
💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.
WalkthroughThe changes update the notification integration functionality across several components. They refactor the NotificationIntegrationModal and TabComponent by introducing structured constants for notification types, adding a helper function for field keys, and converting the test notification handler to an asynchronous function. A custom hook for notification operations has been added to manage test notifications with proper loading and error handling. Additionally, the NetworkService now has a new asynchronous method for sending test notifications, the UI incorporates a loading spinner via CircularProgress, and localization updates have been implemented alongside an updated import path and internationalization hook in the Create page. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant NIM as NotificationIntegrationModal
participant TC as TabComponent
participant UN as useNotifications
participant NS as NetworkService
participant S as Server
U->>NIM: Initiate test notification
NIM->>TC: Call handleTestNotification (async)
TC->>UN: Trigger sendTestNotification with config
UN->>NS: Call testNotification(config)
NS->>S: POST /notifications/test-webhook
S-->>NS: Return response
NS-->>UN: Deliver result
UN-->>TC: Update error/loading state
TC-->>NIM: Reflect UI changes (spinner, disabled state)
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Tip ⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx (4)
147-188: Platform-specific payload handling looks solid but consider refactoringThe switch statement implementation works, but there's some code duplication in the error handling pattern. My palms are getting sweaty looking at this - could be refactored to make maintenance easier.
Consider extracting the validation logic to a separate function to reduce duplication:
// Prepare request payload based on notification type let payload = { platform: type }; + const validateField = (condition, message) => { + if (!condition) { + toast.error(message); + return false; + } + return true; + }; switch(type) { case 'slack': payload.webhookUrl = integrations[getFieldKey('slack', 'webhook')]; - if (!payload.webhookUrl) { - toast.error('Please enter a Slack webhook URL first.'); - return; - } + if (!validateField(payload.webhookUrl, 'Please enter a Slack webhook URL first.')) return; break; case 'discord': payload.webhookUrl = integrations[getFieldKey('discord', 'webhook')]; - if (!payload.webhookUrl) { - toast.error('Please enter a Discord webhook URL first.'); - return; - } + if (!validateField(payload.webhookUrl, 'Please enter a Discord webhook URL first.')) return; break;
178-178: Clarify the reason for hardcoding 'slack' as platform for webhooksThere's a comment stating "Use slack as platform for webhooks", but it's not clear why this is necessary. Consider adding more context in the comment to explain this design decision.
190-193: API URL construction uses good practice with fallbackGood job using environment variables with a fallback for the API URL. However, knees weak, arms are heavy - consider extracting this URL to a constants file to maintain consistency across components.
194-211: Error handling implementation is robust, but validate response earlyThe try-catch block with specific error messaging is well done. However, consider checking response.ok earlier to avoid unnecessarily parsing JSON for failed requests.
const response = await fetch(apiUrl, { method: 'POST', headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }, body: JSON.stringify(payload), }); + if (!response.ok) { + throw new Error(`Failed with status: ${response.status}`); + } + const data = await response.json(); - if (response.ok && data.success) { + if (data.success) { toast.success('Test notification sent successfully!'); } else { throw new Error(data.msg || 'Failed to send test notification'); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx (3)
3-4: Good addition of the toast notification importThe addition of the toast import looks good for providing user feedback in the notification testing flow. Just make sure the
react-toastifypackage is already included in your dependencies.
134-145: Solid implementation of the async notification handler with proper type validationThe conversion to an async function with proper notification type validation is a good approach. The helper function for generating field keys is also clean and reusable.
176-183: Verify webhook platform type override implicationsWhen handling 'webhook' type, you're setting platform to 'slack' (line 178). Make sure this doesn't cause vomit on your sweater already when the backend processes this - confirm that the API expects this behavior for generic webhooks.
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json' | ||
| }, | ||
| body: JSON.stringify(payload), | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Netwrok request should be made through the NetworkService class using the configured Axios instance.
They should also be carried out via a hook that provides a loading state and an error state. Please see other components/pages that make network requests for examples
| const data = await response.json(); | ||
|
|
||
| if (response.ok && data.success) { | ||
| toast.success('Test notification sent successfully!'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
User facing strings need to go through the il8n implementation
| // Get the notification type details | ||
| const notificationType = activeNotificationTypes.find(t => t.id === type); | ||
|
|
||
| if (notificationType === undefined) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please use typeof === "undefined", this is a safer way to check for undefined and is the standard for this app
| const getFieldKey = (typeId, fieldId) => { | ||
| return `${typeId}${fieldId.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + fieldId.slice(1)}`; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This function will throw uncaught errors under many conditions. typeId or fieldId undefined, null, not a string etc.
Let's make this safer and catch errors.
|
|
||
| case 'telegram': | ||
| payload.botToken = integrations[getFieldKey('telegram', 'token')]; | ||
| payload.chatId = integrations[getFieldKey('telegram', 'chatId')]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Constant keys should be refactored out
const TELEGRAM_FIELD = "telegram"
etc. Always best to avoid magic values
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Hooks/useNotification.js (3)
14-20: Unused FIELD_IDS constant definedMom's spaghetti! The FIELD_IDS constant is defined but never used directly in this file. Either remove it or use it consistently throughout the hook.
-// Define constants for field IDs -const FIELD_IDS = { - WEBHOOK: 'webhook', - TOKEN: 'token', - CHAT_ID: 'chatId', - URL: 'url' -};If you decide to keep it, consider adding a comment explaining that it's for consistency with the modal component.
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 15-15: 'FIELD_IDS' is assigned a value but never used.
(no-unused-vars)
44-83: Thorough validation for each notification typeKnees weak, arms are heavy! This validation logic is comprehensive for each notification type, with appropriate error messages. However, consider refactoring to reduce duplication.
Consider extracting a reusable validation function to reduce duplication:
// Add this helper function +const validateField = (value, errorMessage) => { + if (typeof value === 'undefined' || value === '') { + return { isValid: false, errorMessage }; + } + return { isValid: true }; +}; // Then simplify your switch cases: switch(type) { case NOTIFICATION_TYPES.SLACK: payload.webhookUrl = config.webhook; - if (typeof payload.webhookUrl === 'undefined' || payload.webhookUrl === '') { - isValid = false; - errorMessage = t('notifications.slack.webhookRequired', 'Please enter a Slack webhook URL first.'); + const slackValidation = validateField( + payload.webhookUrl, + t('notifications.slack.webhookRequired', 'Please enter a Slack webhook URL first.') + ); + if (!slackValidation.isValid) { + isValid = false; + errorMessage = slackValidation.errorMessage; } break;
35-107: Consider adding retry mechanism for network failuresFor network operations that might fail due to temporary issues, consider implementing a retry mechanism.
You could add a simple retry mechanism like this:
-const sendTestNotification = async (type, config) => { +const sendTestNotification = async (type, config, retries = 2) => { setLoading(true); setError(null); // Validation based on notification type // ...existing validation code... try { const response = await networkService.axiosInstance.post('/notifications/test-webhook', payload); if (response.data.success === true) { toast.success(t('notifications.testSuccess', 'Test notification sent successfully!')); } else { throw new Error(response.data.msg || t('notifications.testFailed', 'Failed to send test notification')); } } catch (error) { + // Check if we should retry + if (error.message === 'Network Error' && retries > 0) { + setLoading(false); + // Wait a bit before retrying + await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000)); + return sendTestNotification(type, config, retries - 1); + } const errorMsg = error.response?.data?.msg || error.message || t('notifications.networkError', 'Network error occurred'); toast.error(`${t('notifications.testFailed', 'Failed to send test notification')}: ${errorMsg}`); setError(errorMsg); } finally { setLoading(false); } };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx(8 hunks)src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/TabComponent.jsx(4 hunks)src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Hooks/useNotification.js(1 hunks)src/Pages/Uptime/Create/index.jsx(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 ESLint
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/TabComponent.jsx
[error] 14-14: 'type' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 15-15: 'integrations' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 16-16: 'handleIntegrationChange' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 17-17: 'handleInputChange' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 18-18: 'handleTestNotification' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 19-19: 'isLoading' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 83-83: 'type.id' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 94-94: 'type.id' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Hooks/useNotification.js
[error] 15-15: 'FIELD_IDS' is assigned a value but never used.
(no-unused-vars)
🔇 Additional comments (25)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/TabComponent.jsx (6)
5-6: Clean up imports with CircularProgress additionAdded CircularProgress import for visual feedback during loading states - good enhancement for user experience!
10-11: Updated import path for input componentsThe import paths for TextInput and Checkbox have been updated. Make sure these components are properly located at these paths.
60-60: Properly handling loading state for checkboxGood job disabling the checkbox during loading state to prevent user interactions while an operation is in progress.
83-83: Improved disabled state logic for text inputsThe TextInput now properly considers both the enabled state of the integration and the loading state. This prevents users from modifying fields during async operations.
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 83-83: 'type.id' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
94-94: Enhanced button disabled state logicThe test notification button is now properly disabled during loading states in addition to the existing conditions. This prevents multiple simultaneous test requests.
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 94-94: 'type.id' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
96-98: Added loading indicator to buttonGreat addition of the visual CircularProgress indicator! This provides clear feedback to users when a test notification is being sent.
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Hooks/useNotification.js (7)
1-5: Good imports for the new hookThe imports are concise and appropriate for the functionality. Using React's useState for state management and react-toastify for notifications is a good choice.
6-12: Well-defined constants for notification typesGood job using constants for notification types instead of magic strings! This improves maintainability and reduces the chance of typos.
22-29: Well-documented hook and state managementGood JSDoc comments and clear state initialization. The loading and error states are appropriately managed.
30-43: Well-structured function signature with JSDocThe sendTestNotification function is well-documented with JSDoc comments. The function signature clearly shows the expected parameters.
85-90: Early return pattern for validation failuresGood use of the early return pattern when validation fails. This avoids unnecessary API calls and improves code clarity.
92-107: Robust error handling for API callPalms are sweaty! The try/catch/finally block properly handles success, errors, and ensures loading state is reset. The error message extraction is thorough.
109-114: Clean hook return valueThe hook returns exactly what consuming components need: loading state, error state, and the core function. This follows React hooks best practices.
src/Pages/Uptime/Create/index.jsx (2)
26-26: Updated import path for NotificationIntegrationModalThe import path has been updated to reflect the new component location. Make sure this path is consistent with the project structure.
416-424: Restored notification integration buttonVomit on his sweater already! You've restored the Box component that was previously commented out, making the notification integration button accessible to users.
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx (10)
3-18: Added imports for notifications and CircularProgressGood imports organization. The addition of CircularProgress for loading states and the new useNotifications hook improves the component functionality.
20-34: Added constants for notification types and field IDsExcellent job defining constants for notification types and field IDs! This replaces magic strings and improves code maintainability.
48-48: Using the new notifications hookGood use of destructuring to get the loading state and sendTestNotification function from the hook.
50-62: Improved field key generation with error handlingThe getFieldKey function now includes robust error handling for invalid inputs. Great defensive programming!
67-204: Using constants instead of hardcoded stringsAll notification types and field IDs are now using the defined constants instead of hardcoded strings. This makes the code more maintainable and less prone to typos.
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 135-135: 'monitor.notifications' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 135-135: 'monitor.notifications.some' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 140-140: 'monitor.notifications' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 140-140: 'monitor.notifications.find' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 189-189: 'monitor.notifications' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
167-185: Implemented async handleTestNotification functionPalms are sweaty! This is the core implementation of the handleTestNotification function. It properly:
- Finds the notification type details
- Builds a configuration object dynamically based on the fields
- Calls the async sendTestNotification function
This is much more robust than hardcoding values for each notification type.
293-293: Passing loading state to TabComponentGood job passing the loading state to the TabComponent. This ensures UI elements are properly disabled during async operations.
311-311: Disabling save button during loadingCorrectly disabling the save button during loading prevents users from triggering multiple save operations simultaneously.
318-318: Added loading indicator to save buttonGreat implementation of conditional rendering to show the CircularProgress component during loading states.
167-185: Verify error handling in handleTestNotificationThe function doesn't have explicit error handling when the notification type is not found or undefined.
Consider adding a more user-friendly error message:
const handleTestNotification = async (type) => { // Get the notification type details const notificationType = activeNotificationTypes.find(t => t.id === type); if (typeof notificationType === "undefined") { + toast.error(t('notifications.unsupportedType', 'This notification type cannot be tested.')); return; } // ... rest of the function
| handleTestNotification, | ||
| isLoading |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
New isLoading prop added to component signature
You've added the isLoading prop to the component parameters, which is used throughout the component to disable interactions during async operations.
Consider adding PropTypes validation for all props to satisfy the ESLint warnings:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if PropTypes is already imported in the file
grep -q "import PropTypes from 'prop-types'" src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/TabComponent.jsx
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "PropTypes import not found, consider adding:"
echo "import PropTypes from 'prop-types';"
echo ""
echo "And add prop validation at the bottom of the file before the export:"
echo "TabComponent.propTypes = {"
echo " type: PropTypes.object.isRequired,"
echo " integrations: PropTypes.object.isRequired,"
echo " handleIntegrationChange: PropTypes.func.isRequired,"
echo " handleInputChange: PropTypes.func.isRequired,"
echo " handleTestNotification: PropTypes.func.isRequired,"
echo " isLoading: PropTypes.bool"
echo "};"
fiLength of output: 1148
Action Required: Add missing PropTypes validation in TabComponent.jsx
The new isLoading prop is now being used correctly, but our verification shows that the PropTypes import and corresponding prop types definition are absent. To satisfy ESLint warnings, please add the following changes:
- At the top of the file, include:
import PropTypes from 'prop-types';
- At the bottom of the file, before the export, add:
TabComponent.propTypes = { type: PropTypes.object.isRequired, integrations: PropTypes.object.isRequired, handleIntegrationChange: PropTypes.func.isRequired, handleInputChange: PropTypes.func.isRequired, handleTestNotification: PropTypes.func.isRequired, isLoading: PropTypes.bool };
His palms are sweaty, knees weak, arms are heavy—let’s fix this before we call it good to go!
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 18-18: 'handleTestNotification' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 19-19: 'isLoading' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
| @@ -26,60 +45,76 @@ const NotificationIntegrationModal = ({ | |||
| const theme = useTheme(); | |||
| const [tabValue, setTabValue] = useState(0); | |||
|
|
|||
| const { loading, sendTestNotification } = useNotifications(); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The standard pattern for hooks is to return an array and destructure that, rather than an object. See the useState() hook above
| */ | ||
| const useNotifications = () => { | ||
| const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false); | ||
| const [error, setError] = useState(null); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please use undefined as the default state instead of null, that's the convention we're using
| return `${typeId}${fieldId.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + fieldId.slice(1)}`; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error('Error generating field key:', error); | ||
| return ''; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we really want to continue here if there is an error? Shouldn't we abort if the typeId or fieldId are not present?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yup you are right. I will implement that.
| try { | ||
| if (typeof typeId !== 'string' || typeId === '' || | ||
| typeof fieldId !== 'string' || fieldId === '') { | ||
| return ''; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we want to continue with an empty string if these values are not strings?
You know better than me what's supposed to happen if these fields are missing, but I imagine you probably wouldn't want to continue 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ya no you are right.
| sx={{ | ||
| width: 'auto', | ||
| minWidth: theme.spacing(60), | ||
| px: theme.spacing(8) | ||
| }} | ||
| > | ||
| {t('common.save', 'Save')} | ||
| {loading ? <CircularProgress size={24} color="inherit" /> : t('common.save', 'Save')} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Don't froget to use the theme for sizses
| > | ||
| {isLoading ? ( | ||
| <CircularProgress size={16} color="inherit" sx={{ mr: 1 }} /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This CircularProgress is a diiffernet size than the one above, intentional?
Theme should be used for sizes and margins
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, Because the save button requires a bigger spinner than the one next to the test notification button.
Used theme for sizes and margins.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does it make more sense to use a regular button with loading state then?
The regular button accepts a loading prop and displays a spinner if it is loading 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yup will use that instead.
| if (typeof payload.botToken === 'undefined' || payload.botToken === '' || | ||
| typeof payload.chatId === 'undefined' || payload.chatId === '') { | ||
| isValid = false; | ||
| errorMessage = t('notifications.telegram.fieldsRequired', 'Please enter both Telegram bot token and chat ID.'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What's going on with this t() method having two parameters? The second param appears to be a hardcoded string which we'd like to avoid.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good point. I got rid of them.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| try { | ||
| const response = await networkService.axiosInstance.post('/notifications/test-webhook', payload); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We shouldn't directly use the axiosInstance, we should define a method in the NetworkService and call that method. Please see the other methods in that class for examples
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks. I implemented it that way.
src/Pages/Uptime/Create/index.jsx
Outdated
| @@ -413,15 +413,15 @@ const CreateMonitor = () => { | |||
| onChange={(event) => handleNotifications(event, "email")} | |||
| /> | |||
|
|
|||
| {/* <Box mt={theme.spacing(2)}> | |||
| <Box mt={theme.spacing(2)}> | |||
| <Button | |||
| variant="contained" | |||
| color="accent" | |||
| onClick={handleOpenNotificationModal} | |||
| > | |||
| Notification Integration | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This string needs to be extracted
|
@Skorpios604 did you forget to push perhaps? I see you marked the comments as addressed but changes haven't been pushed yet? |
Hey @ajhollid I was planning on addressing the backend PR first before pushing. I am done the frontend PR. Did you want me to push? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/TabComponent.jsx (1)
18-19:⚠️ Potential issueProps added but PropTypes validation missing.
The new props are correctly added to the component signature, but PropTypes validation is still missing.
His palms are sweaty, knees weak, arms are heavy—you need to add PropTypes validation for all props to satisfy the ESLint warnings. At the top of the file:
import React from "react"; +import PropTypes from "prop-types"; import { Typography, Box, Button, CircularProgress } from "@mui/material";And at the bottom of the file before the export:
}; +TabComponent.propTypes = { + type: PropTypes.object.isRequired, + integrations: PropTypes.object.isRequired, + handleIntegrationChange: PropTypes.func.isRequired, + handleInputChange: PropTypes.func.isRequired, + handleTestNotification: PropTypes.func.isRequired, + isLoading: PropTypes.bool +}; export default TabComponent;🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 18-18: 'handleTestNotification' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 19-19: 'isLoading' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/TabComponent.jsx (1)
96-101: Consider using MUI Button's loading prop instead of custom CircularProgress.You're implementing a custom loading state with CircularProgress, but the MUI Button component already supports this functionality with a built-in loading prop.
There's vomit on his sweater already, mom's spaghetti—the CircularProgress setup works but it's a bit redundant when MUI Button already has this capability. Consider refactoring to:
<Button variant="text" color="info" onClick={() => handleTestNotification(type.id)} disabled={!integrations[type.id] || !areAllFieldsFilled() || isLoading} + loading={isLoading} + loadingIndicator="Loading..." > - {isLoading ? ( - <CircularProgress - size={theme.spacing(8)} - sx={{ mr: theme.spacing(1), color: theme.palette.accent.main}} - /> - ) : null} {t('notifications.testNotification')} </Button>If you need a specific size for the spinner, you can still customize it with the
loadingPositionandloadingIndicatorprops.src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Hooks/useNotification.js (2)
6-20: Good practice using constants instead of magic strings.Using constant objects for notification types and field IDs is a great practice for maintainability and type safety.
However, it looks like the
FIELD_IDSconstant is defined but never used in the code. You should either utilize it in your validation logic or remove it if it's not needed.// Define constants for notification types to avoid magic values const NOTIFICATION_TYPES = { SLACK: 'slack', DISCORD: 'discord', TELEGRAM: 'telegram', WEBHOOK: 'webhook' }; -// Define constants for field IDs -const FIELD_IDS = { - WEBHOOK: 'webhook', - TOKEN: 'token', - CHAT_ID: 'chatId', - URL: 'url' -};Or better, use these constants in your switch-case validation to avoid hardcoded strings:
switch(type) { case NOTIFICATION_TYPES.SLACK: - payload.webhookUrl = config.webhook; + payload.webhookUrl = config[FIELD_IDS.WEBHOOK];🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 15-15: 'FIELD_IDS' is assigned a value but never used.
(no-unused-vars)
35-110: Well-structured async function with proper error handling.The sendTestNotification function is well-structured with clear validation, error handling, and proper loading state management.
His palms are sweaty, knees weak, arms are heavy—the validation logic has a bit of repetition that could be refactored. Consider extracting common validation patterns into helper functions:
const validateRequiredField = (value) => { return typeof value !== 'undefined' && value !== ''; }; // Then in your switch-case: case NOTIFICATION_TYPES.SLACK: payload.webhookUrl = config.webhook; if (!validateRequiredField(payload.webhookUrl)) { isValid = false; errorMessage = t('notifications.slack.webhookRequired'); } break;This would make the code more DRY and easier to maintain.
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx (2)
48-48: Fix the unused variable warning from ESLint.Hey, I noticed there's a warning about an unused variable. You're destructuring the array from
useNotifications()but the second element_is never used anywhere in your code.- const [loading, _, sendTestNotification] = useNotifications(); + const [loading, , sendTestNotification] = useNotifications();When you just need the first and third elements from an array, you can use empty commas as placeholders without assigning variable names.
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 48-48: '_' is assigned a value but never used.
(no-unused-vars)
166-184: The async notification handling is well implemented!The implementation of
handleTestNotificationas an async function looks solid. You're:
- Finding the notification type
- Validating it exists
- Dynamically building the config object
- Properly awaiting the sendTestNotification call
This is a much more robust approach than what was there before.
However, one suggestion: consider adding error handling around the
await sendTestNotificationcall with try/catch to handle any potential exceptions:- await sendTestNotification(type, config); + try { + await sendTestNotification(type, config); + } catch (error) { + // Handle error - perhaps through a notification system or console + console.error("Failed to send test notification:", error); + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx(8 hunks)src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/TabComponent.jsx(4 hunks)src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Hooks/useNotification.js(1 hunks)src/Pages/Uptime/Create/index.jsx(4 hunks)src/Utils/NetworkService.js(1 hunks)src/locales/en.json(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/Pages/Uptime/Create/index.jsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 ESLint
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/TabComponent.jsx
[error] 14-14: 'type' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 15-15: 'integrations' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 16-16: 'handleIntegrationChange' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 17-17: 'handleInputChange' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 18-18: 'handleTestNotification' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 19-19: 'isLoading' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 83-83: 'type.id' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 94-94: 'type.id' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx
[error] 48-48: '_' is assigned a value but never used.
(no-unused-vars)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Hooks/useNotification.js
[error] 15-15: 'FIELD_IDS' is assigned a value but never used.
(no-unused-vars)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
src/locales/en.json (1)
150-150: LGTM! New localization key added correctly.This addition of a new localization key for the notification integration button looks good. It's properly formatted and nested within the correct notifications section.
src/Utils/NetworkService.js (1)
672-692: Well-documented and properly implemented network method.The
testNotificationmethod follows the established pattern of other methods in this class with clear JSDoc documentation and appropriate parameter handling. The implementation is clean and consistent with the rest of the codebase.src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/TabComponent.jsx (4)
5-6: Good addition of CircularProgress for loading state.Adding CircularProgress to the imports is appropriate for the loading state implementation you're adding to this component.
60-60: Correctly implemented loading state for Checkbox.The disabled state now properly includes the isLoading check.
83-83: Correctly implemented loading state for TextInput.The disabled state now properly includes the isLoading check alongside the existing condition.
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 83-83: 'type.id' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
94-94: Correctly implemented loading state for Button.The disabled state now properly includes the isLoading check with the other conditions.
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 94-94: 'type.id' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Hooks/useNotification.js (2)
25-28: Clean hook setup with proper state initialization.The state management setup with useState is clean and follows React best practices.
112-116: Return value format is clear and consistent.The hook returns a clean array with loading state, error, and the action function, which is a common pattern for custom hooks.
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx (6)
20-26: Good job with the constants! Much better than hardcoded magic strings.You've done a solid job defining constants for all notification types. This makes the code more maintainable and reduces the chances of typos or inconsistencies.
51-61: Nice implementation of error handling in getFieldKey!Great to see you've addressed the previous review comments about error handling. The function now properly validates inputs before proceeding and throws meaningful error messages.
I'm particularly impressed with the clean implementation of the string transformation for the field ID.
317-325: Nicely implemented loading state with dynamic UI changes!The UI handling for the loading state is well done. You're:
- Using the CircularProgress component when loading
- Using theme values for consistent sizing and colors
- Conditionally rendering different content based on loading state
Good job using theme spacing instead of hardcoded pixel values too!
310-310: Consistent loading state management.Good attention to detail here - disabling the save button during loading prevents users from triggering multiple save operations.
138-138: Consistent use of getFieldKey throughout the component.You've done a great job consistently replacing all instances of manual field key generation with calls to the new
getFieldKeyfunction. This reduces duplication and ensures consistency.Also applies to: 179-179, 207-207
18-18: Proper hook import pattern.You've followed the standard pattern of importing hooks from dedicated hook files, which is good for separation of concerns and maintainability.
Don't forget to verify that the hook implementation follows the standard pattern of returning an array as mentioned in previous comments.
| {t('common.save', 'Save')} | ||
| {loading ? | ||
| <CircularProgress | ||
| size={theme.spacing(12)} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You don't need to do this manually, the Button has a loading state. We use that elsewhere so it should be used here too
| color: theme.palette.accent.main | ||
| }} | ||
| /> | ||
| : t('common.save', 'Save') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You can remove the second string I believe.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yup! You are right. I also needed to add the common save to the translation JSON.
Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx (2)
12-13: Unused import alert!I'm noticing
CircularProgressis imported but never actually used in the component. My code sense is tingling - this might be a remnant from previous iterations or intended for future use, but right now it's just hanging out doing nothing.- Tab, - CircularProgress + TabMom's spaghetti would be cleaner without unused imports!
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 13-13: 'CircularProgress' is defined but never used.
(no-unused-vars)
48-48: Unused variable in hook destructuringYou're destructuring a value as
_but never using it. While the underscore convention implies it's intentionally ignored, ESLint is still catching it as an unused variable.- const [loading, _, sendTestNotification] = useNotifications(); + const [loading, , sendTestNotification] = useNotifications();Knees weak, arms heavy when we see unused variables!
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 48-48: '_' is assigned a value but never used.
(no-unused-vars)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx(8 hunks)src/locales/en.json(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/locales/en.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 ESLint
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx
[error] 13-13: 'CircularProgress' is defined but never used.
(no-unused-vars)
[error] 48-48: '_' is assigned a value but never used.
(no-unused-vars)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx (6)
20-34: Nice constants for improved maintainability! LGTMMoving these string values to named constants is a solid upgrade. Makes the code much more readable and helps avoid typos or inconsistencies when referencing notification types and field IDs throughout the component.
50-61: Good implementation of getFieldKey with proper error handling!This implementation properly addresses the previous review comments about handling invalid inputs. The function now throws clear error messages if invalid typeId or fieldId are provided instead of silently continuing.
166-184: Great implementation of handleTestNotification function!The async function is well structured with proper error handling and a clean approach to dynamically build the configuration object based on the notification type. This implementation:
- Finds the notification type details
- Properly handles the case where type is undefined
- Dynamically builds the config object using field definitions
- Asynchronously calls sendTestNotification
Vomit on his sweater already? Nope, this code is clean!
292-292: Loading state passed to TabComponent - good UX improvementAdding the loading state to TabComponent provides better user feedback during the asynchronous test notification process. This is a necessary improvement for UX.
310-310: Using MUI Button's built-in loading propGood job implementing the loading state on the Button using the built-in prop as suggested in the previous review. This follows MUI best practices and provides consistent loading indicators.
317-317: Translation key for common button textUsing the translation key for the save button improves internationalization. Using 'commonSave' suggests this is a shared translation that can be reused across the application.
|
@Skorpios604 ready to go whenever you can resolve merge conflicts. Please be sure not to break the translations when resolving 😂 |
Describe your changes
Implemented the handleTestNotification function.