-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Update version to 1.3.0 #19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ | ||
/* | ||
* Copyright 2025 Diffblue Limited. | ||
* | ||
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"). | ||
* You may not use this file except in compliance with the License. | ||
* A copy of the License is located at | ||
* | ||
* https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
* | ||
* or in the "license" file accompanying this file. This file is distributed | ||
* on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either | ||
* express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing | ||
* permissions and limitations under the License. | ||
*/ | ||
package com.diffblue.cover.annotations; | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Empty interface, required, with the Category annotation, to label JUnit 4 tests in the following | ||
* manner: @Category(MaintainedByDiffblue.class) | ||
*/ | ||
public interface MaintainedByDiffblue {} | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ❔ This is probably something you thought through/tried but I would rather ask - is it enough to have this as an interface or does it need to be a class? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It can be either. The original documentation I found had it as an interface so I did that but I've tested it as a class as well There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Ah cool, if the suggestion in docs is to use an interface (or if JUnit itself uses it) then presumably that's better standard 👍 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Any of class, interface, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ThomasPerkins1123 from process point of view, are you happy for this commit to be part of the same PR or should it be a standalone PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes I am happy with this on this repo, as long as its always its own commit