-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 441
refactor(gnovm): not recursive save when object is dirty #4938
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
🛠 PR Checks Summary🔴 Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff Manual Checks (for Reviewers):
Read More🤖 This bot helps streamline PR reviews by verifying automated checks and providing guidance for contributors and reviewers. ✅ Automated Checks (for Contributors):🟢 Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info) ☑️ Contributor Actions:
☑️ Reviewer Actions:
📚 Resources:Debug
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
- Created append8.gno to test appending bytes to a byte slice. - Created append8b.gno to test appending integers to an integer slice. - Created append8c.gno to test appending structs to a slice of structs. - Added struct63.gno to test nested struct field updates. - Added struct63b.gno to test pointer usage in nested structs. - Added struct63c.gno to test updating nested struct fields with pointers. - Added struct63d.gno to test reassigning nested struct fields. - Added struct63e.gno to test modifying nested struct fields directly.
alternative #4922