ENH: Verify derivatives are compatible with anatomical reference

[mgxd]

Closes #458

This was partially addressed in #443, but this implementation generalizes across surface reconstruction methods.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 7.14286% with 26 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 56.29%. Comparing base (91c5fc3) to head (b4f5a58).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
nibabies/workflows/anatomical/fit.py	6.25%	15 Missing ⚠️
nibabies/workflows/anatomical/preproc.py	8.33%	11 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #459      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   56.46%   56.29%   -0.17%     
==========================================
  Files          70       70              
  Lines        6723     6743      +20     
  Branches      828      830       +2     
==========================================
  Hits         3796     3796              
- Misses       2718     2738      +20     
  Partials      209      209              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[mgxd]

@xxnagit would you mind testing this patch to verify it fixes your issue?

https://github.com/nipreps/nibabies/wiki/Testing

[xxnagit]

I have to run this pipeline on HPC, if there is any docker image available, I'm more than happy to try it out. Thank you so much!

[mgxd]

sure, you can use nipreps/nibabies:derivatives-no-preproc

[xxnagit]

I tried a few more subjects this time as the first time when I reported the bug it was just for one subject. I realized my input are quite different for the orientations, and the outputs of Bibsnet are not uniform due to the consistency with the original input. While when these derivatives are plugged into the infantFS (which requires neurological orientation), it may end up with errors for some cases not the others. This docker image however, can't handle all those variances. In one case with the orientation as aligned with infantFS, I do see the new docker image can tolerate the slight difference between the affine matrix. I'll see if aligning my error cases to the requested orientation can resolve the rest. Thank you!