Skip to content

bench: refactor to use string interpolation in tools/snippets #9626

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
kgryte merged 5 commits into from
Jan 9, 2026
Merged

bench: refactor to use string interpolation in tools/snippets #9626

kgryte merged 5 commits into from
Jan 9, 2026

Conversation

@ivishal-g
Copy link
Contributor

@ivishal-g ivishal-g commented Jan 8, 2026 •
edited by kgryte
Loading

Progresses #8647 .

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • Refactors the JavaScript benchmark in @stdlib/tools/snippets to @stdlib/string/format for string interpolation instead of string concatenation when specifying the benchmark name.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

  • None

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

  • Yes
  • No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

  • Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
  • Test/benchmark generation
  • Documentation (including examples)
  • Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

{{TODO: add disclosure if applicable}}

@stdlib-js/reviewers

ivishal-g and others added 5 commits January 5, 2026 15:26
@ivishal-g
bench: refactor to use string interpolation in buffer/from-array-buffer
b61c7b7 
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@ivishal-g
Merge branch 'stdlib-js:develop' into develop
400cdf8
@ivishal-g
Merge branch 'stdlib-js:develop' into develop
b71f0ba
@ivishal-g
Merge branch 'stdlib-js:develop' into develop
b2d1650
@ivishal-g
bench: refactor to use string interpolation i tools/snippets
05d2a40 
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. labels Jan 8, 2026
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Jan 9, 2026

⚠️ Tracking Issue Closure Warning ⚠️

I noticed your PR description contains closing keywords ("Resolves", "Closes", or "Fixes") referencing a "Tracking Issue".

Why this matters:
Tracking issues should typically remain open until all related sub-issues are completed. GitHub automatically closes issues with such closing keywords when the PR is merged. For more information, see GitHub's documentation on using keywords in issues and pull requests.

Required action:
Use "Progresses" instead to reference the tracking issue without automatically closing it.

Thank you for your contribution to the project!

@kgryte kgryte removed the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Jan 9, 2026
kgryte
kgryte approved these changes Jan 9, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@kgryte kgryte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kgryte
Copy link
Member

kgryte commented Jan 9, 2026

As the CI failure is expected, I'll go ahead and merge.

@kgryte kgryte merged commit 6c1a3b7 into stdlib-js:develop Jan 9, 2026
59 of 60 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@kgryte kgryte kgryte approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ivishal-g @stdlib-bot @kgryte