Refs #37987 - Replace undefined method #10738
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
adamruzicka
reviewed
Oct 24, 2025
ekohl
reviewed
Oct 24, 2025
Member
ekohl
left a comment
ekohl
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since this is a bugfix for https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/37987, could use you Refs #37987 on this PR?
adamlazik1
force-pushed
the
remove-undefined-method
branch
from
fe54d6a to
6bb0a9f
Compare
adamlazik1
changed the title
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks @ekohl, done. |
Member
|
There's a typo in |
theforeman#10370 removed the method `limited?`, so it should be replaced here.
adamlazik1
force-pushed
the
remove-undefined-method
branch
from
6bb0a9f to
24e9d1d
Compare
Contributor
Author
Fixed. |
stejskalleos
approved these changes
Nov 7, 2025
Contributor
|
Thanks @adamlazik1 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#10370 removed the method
limited?, so it should be replaced here.