-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 164
Give the Advisory Board a mission statement #1021
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -872,27 +872,30 @@ Advisory Board (AB)</h4> | |||||||||||
| <h5 id=ab-role> | ||||||||||||
| Role of the Advisory Board</h5> | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
| The <dfn export lt="Advisory Board|AB">Advisory Board</dfn> provides ongoing guidance to the Team | ||||||||||||
| The <dfn export lt="Advisory Board|AB">Advisory Board</dfn> | ||||||||||||
| is elected by the Membership to advance the effectiveness of W3C as a community by: | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
| <ul> | ||||||||||||
| <li>Providing ongoing guidance to the Team | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| is elected by the Membership to advance the effectiveness of W3C as a community by: | |
| <ul> | |
| <li>Providing ongoing guidance to the Team | |
| is elected by the Membership to provide ongoing guidance to the Team, on behalf of the Membership, |
(with subsequent markup tweaks left for the editor - I think they're obvious).
frivoal marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
frivoal marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought the role was stronger than this with respect to the process?
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought the role was stronger than this with respect to the process?
In what sense?
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| and has no decision-making authority over W3C; | |
| and has no decision-making authority over W3C. |
Punctuation consistent with the prior suggestion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| its role is strictly advisory. |
Given the AB's role in managing the Process document (and now also The Vision, and facilitating the Code of Conduct, which can be a separate PR), and FO Councils, it's high time to remove this legacy phrase which causes more confusion than clarity in practice.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am cautiously in favor of this proposed removal. Removing this sentence does not cause the AB to gain any decision power it does not otherwise have, so this seems to be a safe change, and "strictly" hasn't really been true, so this is a likely source of confusion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In fact, I don't believe that sentence is correct anymore. The Process says: "Revision of the W3C Process and related documents (see below) undergoes similar consensus-building processes as for technical reports, with the Advisory Board acting as the sponsoring Working Group.".
So, the AB does have decision powers, similar to Working Groups. Both are subject to AC Reviews.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.