Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v3: use dev version number (draft) #1020

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

joshmoore
Copy link
Member

For discussion. Until v3 is finalized, using a "dev" marker for the v3 version string would prevent datasets that are written in a transitional state from becoming normative.

This follows on from the PRs by @grlee77 to add support for writing V3 (#898) and to hide those implementations unless the user explicitly sets an environment variable (#1007).

An unknown here is how many v3 filesets are already in the wild. xtensor-zarr (cc: @davidbrochart) and z5 (@constantinpape) have had writing support for some time.

If we decide to move forward with this change, we should synchronize implementations and make an effort to contact (known) users of these transitional v3 implementations.

For discussion. Until v3 is finalized, using a "dev" marker
for the v3 version string would prevent datasets that are
written in a transitional state from becoming normative.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 4, 2022

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.94%. Comparing base (5cdb202) to head (e88e59d).
Report is 372 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1020   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.94%   99.94%           
=======================================
  Files          34       34           
  Lines       13847    13847           
=======================================
  Hits        13840    13840           
  Misses          7        7           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
zarr/meta.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
zarr/tests/test_storage_v3.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

@joshmoore joshmoore mentioned this pull request May 20, 2022
2 tasks
@joshmoore
Copy link
Member Author

Closing this in favor of the environment variable protection, though I think this is a strategy we should consider the next time we are amidst a major overhaul.

cc: @jstriebel

@joshmoore joshmoore closed this Jan 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants