Skip to content

Conversation

@TokageItLab
Copy link
Member

Context: #100845 (comment)

Instead of exposing it, keep it as an internal refactoring. Also, write more essential things about function names and comments.

We will conduct tests later to ensure that the calculations remain unchanged before and after this.

@TokageItLab TokageItLab added this to the 4.x milestone Jun 11, 2025
@TokageItLab TokageItLab requested review from a team as code owners June 11, 2025 20:28
@TokageItLab TokageItLab removed the request for review from a team June 11, 2025 20:28
@TokageItLab TokageItLab force-pushed the blend_with_rest branch 2 times, most recently from d82a2e5 to 5e16f6a Compare June 11, 2025 20:33
@fire fire requested a review from a team June 11, 2025 20:43
@fire fire moved this to Work in progress in Animation Team Issue Triage Jun 11, 2025
@TokageItLab TokageItLab modified the milestones: 4.x, 4.6 Aug 29, 2025
@TokageItLab TokageItLab moved this from Work in progress to Ready for review in Animation Team Issue Triage Sep 19, 2025
@TokageItLab
Copy link
Member Author

For now, the only existing code where the notation changes is the LookAtModifier. Therefore, I think it's sufficient if there are no issues with its out-of-boundary crossing tests.

look_at_test.zip

lat

The capture shows the behavior after this PR, but there was no change before and after the PR.

@TokageItLab TokageItLab force-pushed the blend_with_rest branch 3 times, most recently from fa51129 to e574882 Compare October 7, 2025 17:41
@TokageItLab TokageItLab force-pushed the blend_with_rest branch 3 times, most recently from 28ed8df to b54e30f Compare October 15, 2025 21:48
@TokageItLab TokageItLab force-pushed the blend_with_rest branch 3 times, most recently from 9aabaf0 to 9662663 Compare October 31, 2025 20:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: Ready for review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant