Sprint 5 deliverables Sprint 6 planning notes

High level tasks accomplished

• Merged/finished - #72 https://github.com/unicef/etools-partner-reporting-portal/issues/72
• A set of new API endpoints including Add indicator on Cluster reporting, Narratives, and etc. mostly focused on "cluster reporting" section
• Finished viewing of disaggregation indicator report tables for a location for all possible cases!
• Few more data model changes to support disaggregated data at indicator report and indicator level.
• A Polymer scaffolding for Cluster reporting and routing feature(s)
• Fake data improvement for finalized Quantity type disaggregation entry cases, SUM calculation method post processing
• IndicatorLocationData PUT request with data validation, which enables the user to upload their reports for a location.
• Disaggregation editable table component (and if possible and optional, an update on edit table swapping from checkbox interaction)

Sprint 5 planning

• Tasks available and ready in IP reporting in PRP milestone currently.
• Tasks available and ready in Cluster reporting in PRP milestone currently.

Open issues to discuss

• Review revised results screen in cluster reporting interface that aligns well with IP reporting and reduces number of interfaces needed nicely. https://projects.invisionapp.com/share/EDBIM0Y8M#/screens/243476913

Misc.

• Will IMO’s / agencies enter indicator reports for their cluster objective or cluster activity indicators in PRP?
• Revisit analysis piece: https://projects.invisionapp.com/share/EDBIM0Y8M#/screens/232048953
• Should a partner be permitted to submit an “ad-hoc” report on an indicator (outside of their usual reporting requirement)?
• Should the IMO be required or informed of submitted reports? Do they have to view and “approve” each?
• How should an IMO view collective progress made on an indicator for an activity?
• Should indicators always be linked to an activity - or is it ok to have them only linked to a project?
• Should indicators in a cluster objective be disaggregated?
• Would IMO’s be open to reporting on Cluster objective indicators in the PRP interface itself (level 0 / totals only)
• Why not have IMO’s report on cluster activity indicators in PRP as well, even though they may aggregate the results offline / using partners who used PRP and ones who did not etc. They may choose to disaggregate or just enter totals of course.
• IMO entering data on behalf of a partner for a indicator report.

Mockups/UX related:

• Please review / confirm the response plan related decision / interaction (top right next to country dropdown): https://projects.invisionapp.com/share/EDBIM0Y8M#/screens/232073629
• Re-confirm partner flow for adding activities (custom versus cluster activity linked) - https://projects.invisionapp.com/share/EDBIM0Y8M#/screens/232533036 https://github.com/unicef/etools-partner-reporting-portal/issues/174
• Can the indicators ( https://projects.invisionapp.com/share/EDBIM0Y8M#/screens/232533791 ) and progress tabs ( https://projects.invisionapp.com/share/EDBIM0Y8M#/screens/232533789 ) be merged into one through the interface?

Goals for new sprint

• Deliver on revised PMP specification document
• Get "results" in cluster reporting finished (leverages lot of components/logic from IP reporting)
• Specifications for UI changes ( https://github.com/unicef/etools-partner-reporting-portal/issues/177 ) and analysis in cluster reporting finalized.
• Finish all functionality relating to response parameters and my contributions in the interface, except for partner activity management

Action points/new tickets from showcase discussions